Author / James Ross Kelly
The Erastus Conundrum | Keith Giles
Christians Must Not Excuse Themselves From Helping Others | Henry Karlson
The man born blind was not blind as the result of any sin, and yet people tried to find excuses to justify their indifference to him. We must not follow […]
Source: Christians Must Not Excuse Themselves From Helping Others | Henry Karlson
Three Cheers for Socialism | DAVID BENTLEY HART
In the late modern world something like socialism is the only possible way of embodying Christian love in concrete political practices.
Everything Is Connected: Reflections on “Home” on the 5th Anniversary of Laudato Si’: Center for Catholic Intellectual Heritage: Loyola University Chicago
God Doesn’t Do Politics – The Knowable Mystery
They were called little Christ’s for following the teachings of Jesus. They were following The Way. This would be a good time to acknowledge that they were not political. They followed the teaching of Jesus. Jesus was not about politics. He was about caring for the sick. Caring for the widow, caring for the other. This list goes on and on. His agenda was not political. It was anti-politics, anti othering, and anti-hate.
How a Plague Exposed the “Christian Nation” Myth | Jayson D. Bradley
When an unarmed black man or woman is shot and killed on camera, they instantly make excuses on behalf of authorities. That can look like trotting out an old mugshot to prove that person’s terrible character, or simply pointing out that they got themselves killed by not being obedient enough. But when asked to stay home, patriots have no problem grabbing their guns and defying orders. The mixture of Christianity and Americanism is a troubling tincture, enabling people to cite Romans 13 to get others to obey authority while they stock up weapons to fight off a potentially tyrannical government. Any religion that demands that others take up their cross while we take up our sword is not Christianity.
Source:
| Jayson D. Bradley
OLD-GROWTH FORESTS: CARBON WARRIORS—PAUL STAMETS
I was born on July 17, 1955. At the time, the carbon dioxide levels on this planet were 310 to 320 parts per million. Now, we’re over 400 parts per million, higher than at any point in at least the past eight hundred thousand years.
1-That’s over a 20 percent increase in my lifetime. Such geo-atmospheric cycles usually take thousands or even millions of years to occur, and we’re seeing it within my sixty-plus years of life. In terms of geologic cycles, this is sudden; nearly instantaneous. Scientists are sounding the alarms while denialists have their heads in the sand. This is an all-hands-on-deck moment. The science has clearly established that mycelium networks act as the most significant biological storage sink for carbon— far more than what is stored in above-ground flora and trees.
2-But we need both, and old-growth forests are the best above ground storage of carbon anywhere in the world. It used to be that the metric we used to measure the value of an old-growth forest was the economic value of the lumber. But that metric is quickly being offset with the advances in science. We’re going down a slippery slope. As we deforest the planet and cut down old-growth forests, we accelerate carbon loss, temperature rise, and ecosphere devastation. Biodiversity plummets. Humans experience poverty, disease, and unsustainability. This has all been well demonstrated.
3-Intact forest ecosystems, by comparison, provide more ecological services than just board feet of lumber. They clean the water, provide shade, and give communities plants, insects, and animals. Protecting our forests is essential not only for our survival now, but also for the survival of generations to come.
—PAUL STAMETS
Stamets, Paul. Fantastic Fungi: Expanding Consciousness, Alternative Healing, Environmental Impact // Official Book of Smash Hit Documentary (Kindle Locations 282-297). Earth Aware Editions. Kindle Edition.
Rage Against The Machine – Killing In The Name (Live At Finsbury Park) – YouTube
The Purpose of Imaginative Fiction – written by Elena Shalneva
When I learned that the 2020 International Booker Prize was going ahead in spite of London’s lockdown, I rejoiced at the organisers’ resourcefulness and resilience. But then I began reading the posts about this year’s prize on the Booker website and my enthusiasm dwindled. Surveying press responses to publication of the shortlist, the organisers spotlighted the Guardian‘s observation that nominee Marieke Lucas Rijneveld is only 28 years old, “identifies as male and uses the pronouns they/them.” The New York Times, we are told, had noted that four of the six shortlisted nominees are women, and the Sydney Morning Herald had informed its readers that one of these women is a refugee who fled to Australia from Iran. A separate post made mention of “such enormous themes as intellectual freedom, sexual identity, political unrest, and loss.” I find it unfortunate that the literary industry, eager to advertise its diversity credentials, panders to the media’s obsession with secondary considerations such as choice of subject matter and author identity, rather than focusing on essential considerations such as talent …


