The Rise and Fall of Baylor University’s Michael Polanyi Center–William Dembski


Dembskihttp://www.designinference.com/documents/2007.12.MPC_Rise_and_Fall.htm

Loving Your Enemies in an Age of Terrorism | RELEVANT Magazine


 

http://www.relevantmagazine.com/current/loving-your-enemies-age-terrorism

dalistjhncrssWhen we Americans focus on radical Islamist terror, all too frequently our Muslim neighbors become part of the hated enemy by association. When the focus shifts to government-hating American militiamen, our hatred spills over onto isolationist conservatives. All too easily, fear of the few metastasizes into fear and even hatred of the many. At its extreme, our fear walls us off from anyone we perceive as not like us.

The call of Jesus is to smash those walls we’ve built, to reach through the breach, to touch and meet and serve those we thought were enemies. Not just the ones halfway around the world, but the ones in our neighborhoods and towns who may be hiding in fear themselves.

Read more at http://www.relevantmagazine.com/current/loving-your-enemies-age-terrorism#LM5GAePRzsvZG6eF.99

Loving Your Enemies in an Age of Terrorism | RELEVANT Magazine.

 

The Human Brain–the most ‘centro-complex’ organism in the universe– Pierre Teilhard de Chardin


 

th

..the human brain (the most ‘centro-complex’ organism yet achieved to our knowledge in the universe)..

from an Essay, “Turmoil or Genesis?” by

  Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, in  The Future of Man. 1969 Harper Torchbook, pp 228-228

Exposing Popular Culture’s Quest to Unseat the Biblical Christ–Bock & Wallace


In 2007, Darrell L. Bock and Daniel B. Wallace wrote a ground shaking response to the popular effort to dismiss Jesus as who He said he was in the Gospels. In  Dethroning Jesus: Exposing Popular Culture’s Quest to Unseat the Biblical Christ,  from the Jesus Seminar to Bart Ehrman’s best selling Misquoting Jesus: The Story behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, and the truth of the Gnostic gospels which have gained favor as secular alternatives to the Gospel; Bock & Wallace deconstruct the one-sidedness of  these popular arguments that have become so prevalent in secular conversations about Jesus. These two scholars show the critical thinking in the orthodox view of Christianity can be delivered with brilliant and accessible writing. Never mean-spirited, Bock and Wallace give Ehrman, Borg, and Crossan their due when they are right about inconsistencies in conservative Theology, whilst showing that two thousand years of relevant Christian doctrine is still the most viable notion about the risen Christ. Here, well into their critic of the Jesus Seminar, Bock and Wallace (Ph.Ds. and writers, Bock (Jesus According to Scripture) and Wallace, author of one of the most widely used textbooks on New Testament Greek grammar) show the importance of answering secular scholars, in a cogent manner and how ‘either, or ‘ politics dissuades the relevance Christianity has– away from Jesus Himself.

dt JesusThe Gospels devote much more space to Jesus’ teaching on the human heart or on religious hypocrisy because the danger in religious hypocrisy is that God’s name is misrepresented and brought to shame. The problem for Jesus is not “them” but “us.” The reform he calls for is that of our lives, every part of our lives. Change begins in the human heart. Then we are called to live out Christian values as an example to the world in any locale or context in which God places us. When Borg and Crossan say that Jesus is against egoism and injustice and for personal and political transformation (2006, 210), they are closer to being on track. However, most of what they say in their review of Jesus’ last week misses the fact that Jesus is the key to this transformation, not just his teaching. Jesus doesn’t urge us to choose virtue. He presents himself as the giver of a gift from God that solves the internal human problem. His death reveals even more about who we are and what we need, so that we, transformed from within, can serve God humbly and allow his power to enable us to con-tribute to the transformation to which God directs us. The domination Jesus seeks to free us from involves something more profound than just politics.

If there is a parable in the resurrection story, it is in the lives that Jesus’ followers are to live as they practice righteousness as a community. They are called to model the lifestyle and values Jesus taught as reflecting God’s will, values that represent real life. These values do include justice, compassion, and nonexploitation, but they also include respect for life, and a concern that liberty does not step on those who cannot defend themselves, whether they be the poor in the streets, the victims of terrorism, or the silent in the womb. Injustice surrounds us everywhere. This is why Paul declared that all sin and fall short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:21–25a). It is why the earliest followers of Jesus proclaimed that all need the new life Jesus brings through his Spirit. Forgiveness before God is not an issue for either political conservatives or liberals. It is a both-and, for sin is so pervasive that all of us have participated in it and need to seek forgiveness and also grant it to others. One of the causes of our cultural divide nowadays is that each side of the political divide has been selective in its application of the values Jesus taught.

Bock, Darrell L.  and  Wallace, Daniel B. (2007-11-06). Dethroning Jesus: Exposing Popular Culture’s Quest to Unseat the Biblical Christ (Kindle Locations 2434-2451). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.

The Genius and Faith of Faraday and Maxwell — The New Atlantis


Faraday

Faraday

The Genius and Faith of Faraday and Maxwell – The New Atlantis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maxwell

Maxwell

 

 

The fundamental conflict between Calvinism and Arminianism is not sovereignty but God’s character–Roger E. Olson


Roger E. Olson

Roger E. Olson

“Basic to Arminianism is God’s love. The fundamental conflict between Calvinism and Arminianism is not sovereignty but God’s character. If Calvinism is true, God is the author of sin, evil, innocent suffering and hell. That is to say, if Calvinism is true God is not all-loving and perfectly good. John 3:16 says “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life.” “God so loved the world.” Calvinists must explain this as meaning that God loves “all kinds of people,” not everyone. Or that “God loves all people in some ways but only some people [the elect] in all ways.” Arminians believe these interpretations distort the clear message of the Bible about God’s love. If Calvinism is true, John Wesley said, God’s love is “such a love as makes the blood run cold.” It is indistinguishable from hate—for a large portion of humanity created in his own likeness and image.”

Read more: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2013/03/whats-wrong-with-calvinism/#ixzz3NLbVvXR9