Rupert Sheldrake, the Most Controversial Scientist on Earth, Speaks Out

This article was published in New Dawn 169 Author and biologist Rupert Sheldrake has courted considerable controversy during his long career. Perhaps best known for his hypothesis of morphic resonance (that the so-called laws of nature are more like habits subject to change – see ‘What is Morphic Resonance’ in this issue of New Dawn), his tussles with the scientific establishment reveal a great deal about the dogmatism of mainstream science. Like on Facebook To stay in touch & get our latest news Beginning with A New Science of Life – published in 1981 – his many books about…

Source: Rupert Sheldrake, the Most Controversial Scientist on Earth, Speaks Out

Bernardo Kastrup–This philosopher goes toe-to-toe with materialist science… so far he’s undefeated–from Skeptiko

Bernardo Kastrup


Source: This philosopher goes toe-to-toe with materialist science… so far he’s undefeated |274| – Skeptiko – Science at the Tipping Point

Alex Tsakiris: Okay, Bernardo. Let me move on to another couple of criticisms and here’s one of my favorites because it really captures the lack of deep thinking that always seems to accompany this goofy materialism. I hate to say it so conclusively but we’ve both been doing this for a long time, and you go down these rutted roads that have been so well worn that after a while you see it coming. But you label this as criticism #14: Why would consciousness deceive us by simulating a materialist world?

Dr. Bernardo Kastrup: It is a precious one, isn’t it?

Alex Tsakiris: It is precious in the same way that a child says something, and it’s just precious. It doesn’t make a lot of sense, but you just have to marvel at it.

Dr. Bernardo Kastrup: There is so much prejudice imbedded in it in a way that people are not self-reflectively aware of it. It’s amazing. As I write in the book, why did the sun deceive us for so many centuries by pretending to go around the Earth? Why did the Earth itself deceive us for so long by pretending to be flat? It’s the same kind of question as asking why is the universe deceiving us by pretending materialism to be correct? It’s not the universe. The universe it what it is. The sun has always been doing what it always did. The Earth has always been spheroid since it’s formation. Nothing is deceiving anything. The only thing that’s deceiving is ourselves. Materialists are deceiving themselves by interpreting the world according to a certain perspective, certain implicit, hidden assumptions. And they are so committed to that, thinking so much within the box, when they are pushed out of the box they ask this kind of question. Why is the world deceiving me by pretending materialism to be true? Yeah, ask the sun why it deceived us by pretending to go around the Earth. It’s the same kind of question.

Brief Peeks Beyond: Critical Essays on Metaphysics, Neuroscience, Free Will, Skepticism and Culture by Bernardo Kastrup

Watch “Scientific Evidence for the Christian Faith – Hugh Ross, PhD” on YouTube

Historic Worldviews–Nature..Machine or Living Organism?–Sheldrake

Worldview God Nature
Traditional Christian God Interactive Nature Living organism
Early mechanistic God Interactive Nature Machine
Enlightenment deism God Creator only Nature Machine
Romantic deism God Creator only Nature Living organism
Romantic atheism No God Nature Living organism
Materialism No God Nature Machine

Sheldrake, Rupert (2012-09-04). Science Set Free: 10 Paths to New Discovery (p. 39). Random House, Inc.. Kindle Edition.