Bernardo Kastrup–This philosopher goes toe-to-toe with materialist science… so far he’s undefeated–from Skeptiko


Bernardo Kastrup

 

Source: This philosopher goes toe-to-toe with materialist science… so far he’s undefeated |274| – Skeptiko – Science at the Tipping Point

Alex Tsakiris: Okay, Bernardo. Let me move on to another couple of criticisms and here’s one of my favorites because it really captures the lack of deep thinking that always seems to accompany this goofy materialism. I hate to say it so conclusively but we’ve both been doing this for a long time, and you go down these rutted roads that have been so well worn that after a while you see it coming. But you label this as criticism #14: Why would consciousness deceive us by simulating a materialist world?

Dr. Bernardo Kastrup: It is a precious one, isn’t it?

Alex Tsakiris: It is precious in the same way that a child says something, and it’s just precious. It doesn’t make a lot of sense, but you just have to marvel at it.

Dr. Bernardo Kastrup: There is so much prejudice imbedded in it in a way that people are not self-reflectively aware of it. It’s amazing. As I write in the book, why did the sun deceive us for so many centuries by pretending to go around the Earth? Why did the Earth itself deceive us for so long by pretending to be flat? It’s the same kind of question as asking why is the universe deceiving us by pretending materialism to be correct? It’s not the universe. The universe it what it is. The sun has always been doing what it always did. The Earth has always been spheroid since it’s formation. Nothing is deceiving anything. The only thing that’s deceiving is ourselves. Materialists are deceiving themselves by interpreting the world according to a certain perspective, certain implicit, hidden assumptions. And they are so committed to that, thinking so much within the box, when they are pushed out of the box they ask this kind of question. Why is the world deceiving me by pretending materialism to be true? Yeah, ask the sun why it deceived us by pretending to go around the Earth. It’s the same kind of question.

Brief Peeks Beyond: Critical Essays on Metaphysics, Neuroscience, Free Will, Skepticism and Culture by Bernardo Kastrup

Science Set Free


‘About two-thirds of the papers in leading psychology journals turn out to be non-replicable, and more than 75% of papers in top-tier biomedical journals cannot be validated.” Rupert Sheldrake

 

sciencesetfree

Source: Science Set Free

Historic Worldviews–Nature..Machine or Living Organism?–Sheldrake


Worldview God Nature
Traditional Christian God Interactive Nature Living organism
Early mechanistic God Interactive Nature Machine
Enlightenment deism God Creator only Nature Machine
Romantic deism God Creator only Nature Living organism
Romantic atheism No God Nature Living organism
Materialism No God Nature Machine

Sheldrake, Rupert (2012-09-04). Science Set Free: 10 Paths to New Discovery (p. 39). Random House, Inc.. Kindle Edition.

Rupert Sheldrake at EU 2013—”Science Set Free” (Part 2) – YouTube


Rupert Sheldrake at EU 2013—”Science Set Free” (Part 2) – YouTube.