Nihilism and the End of Law — Phillip E. Johnson


phillip e johnson

Nihilism and the End of the Law by Phillip E. Johnson

“Secularized intellectuals have long been complacent in their apostasy because they were sure they weren’t missing anything important in consigning God to the ashcan of history. They were happy to replace the Creator with a mindless evolutionary process that left humans free and responsible only to themselves. They complacently assumed that when their own reasoning power was removed from its grounding in the only ultimate reality, it could float, unsupported, on nothing at all. As modernist rationalism gives way in universities to its own natural child-postmodernist nihilism-modernists are learning very slowly what a bargain they have made. It isn’t a bargain a society can live with indefinitely.”

Watch “Saints and Sceptics. Dr Mark McCartney” addresses scientism, Dawkins, the legitimacy of “Christians” as scientists– on YouTube


Watch “How Badly Did Scribes Change the New Testament Bible? (Dr. Daniel B. Wallace)” on YouTube


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-RMdX0zi-Q&feature=youtube_gdata_player

God of the Gaps: Five Problems with a Terrible Slogan – Saints and Sceptics


God of the Gaps: Five Problems with a Terrible Slogan – Saints and Sceptics.

 

apollo08

Norman Geisler: No one is converted through Apologetics?


Norman Geisler: No one is converted through apologetics.

Why Evolution is Irrelevant to the Design Argument


This is a pristine argument! Hope you will approve my reblog.

Welcome to Babylon Where Apologetics Must Come Before One Can Even Understand the Gospel | Pastor Matt


Welcome to Babylon Where Apologetics Must Come Before One Can Even Understand the Gospel | Pastor Matt.

Is Evil a Problem Only for Christianity? | Ratio Christi


Is Evil a Problem Only for Christianity? | Ratio Christi.

Stuff Exists—Harold Eberle


Harold R. Eberle

Harold R. Eberle

Stuff exists; therefore, there had to be a stuff creator. There comes a time when people should quit arguing and just laugh at stupid ideas— and this includes the atheists’ most cherished belief. I don’t want to be rude; I want to make the obvious obvious. The acceptance of God’s existence is not a blind leap. Just the opposite is true— to not believe in a stuff creator is to be blind to the obvious. It is absurd not to believe in a stuff creator. Of course, we have lost the Western atheists in this discussion because the Scientific Revolution (and the Enlightenment that followed) set up in their minds a dichotomy of faith versus reason. Their definitions of faith and reason exclude God from the realm of reason. In reality, those categories are pure assumptions— false assumptions. Indeed, we cannot prove the existence of God to the atheist who refuses to let go of those assumed categories. In like fashion, we cannot prove the existence of bacteria to a person who refuses to look through a microscope and see the bacteria for himself. If, however, a person is willing to look through a microscope, then we can prove to him the existence of bacteria. Similarly, if an atheist is willing to look at the world, outside of his present dichotomous framework, then we can prove the existence of God. Here it is: stuff exists, so a stuff creator exists (or at least existed in the past). Atheistic readers may object and quickly argue that this is no argument for the existence of the Christian God. Indeed, I have not yet stated anything about this creator’s nature, and to argue against the Christian God at this point is to change the subject. It is to dodge the bullet, to hide behind a smoke screen. So long as we define God as the stuff creator, it is absurd not to accept God’s existence.

Eberle, Harold (2009-12-28). Christianity Unshackled: Are You A Truth Seeker (pp. 81-82). Destiny Image, Inc.. Kindle Edition.

Watch “Prof. John Lennox speaks at the Parliamentary Prayer Breakfast 2013” on YouTube


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhZxdn_DK5s&feature=youtube_gdata_player