Category / God
Watch “A Pastor’s Thoughts from John McArthur’s Strange Fire Conference by Shane Idleman” on YouTube
Watch “Heidi Baker highlights at BSSM: Love Looks Like Trust” on YouTube
Read the book of Leviticus and then turn to Acts— from “What is so Amazing about Grace?” by Phillip Yancy
You need only read the book of Leviticus and then turn to Acts to sense the seismic change. Whereas Old Testament worshipers purified themselves before entering the temple and presented their offerings to God through a priest, in Acts God’s followers (good Jews, most of them) were meeting in private homes and addressing God with the informal Abba. It was a familiar term of family affection like “Daddy,” and before Jesus no one would have thought of applying such a word to Yaweh, the Sovereign Lord of the Universe. After him it became the standard word used by the early Christians to address God in prayer.
Earlier, I drew a parallel of a visitor in the White House. No such visitor I said, could expect to barge into the Oval Office to see the President without an appointment. There are exceptions. During John F. Kennedy’s administration, photographers sometimes captured a winsome scene. Seated around the President’s desk in gray suits, cabinet members are debating matters of world consequence, such as the Cuban missile crisis. Meanwhile, a toddler, the two-year-old John-John, crawls atop the huge Presidential desk, oblivious to White House protocol and the weighty matters of state. John-John was simply visiting his daddy, and sometimes to his father’s delight he would wander into the Oval Office with nary a knock.
That is the kind of shocking accessibility conveyed in Jesus’ word Abba. God may be Sovereign Lord of the Universe, but through his Son, God has made himself as approachable as any doting human father. In Romans 8. Paul brings the image of intimacy even closer. God’s Spirit lives inside us, he says, and when we do not know what we ought to pray “the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express.”
We need not approach God by a ladder of hierarchy, anxious about cleanliness issues. If God’s kingdom had a “no Oddballs Allowed,” sign posted, none of us could get in, Jesus came to demonstrate that a perfect and holy God welcomes pleas for help from a widow with two mites and from a Roman centurion and a miserable publican and a thief on a cross. We need only call out “Abba” or failing that simply groan. God has come that close.
Phillip Yancy, What is so Amazing about Grace? Zondervan 1997, page 152
Does the Argument from Desire Have Any Bite? | Pastor Matt
Watch “Jesus: A Unique Savior (2 of 2) – Ravi Zacharias” on YouTube
Show me Your Glory–Worship
A Response to Richard Dawkins
The cosmos as a developing organism–Rupert Sheldrake
The philosopher David Hume (1711– 76) is perhaps best known today for his skepticism about religion. Yet he was equally skeptical about the mechanistic philosophy of nature. There was nothing in the universe to prove that it was more like a machine than an organism; the organization we see in nature was more analogous to plants and animals than to machines. Hume was against the idea of a machine-designing God, and suggested instead that the world could have originated from something like a seed or an egg. In Hume’s words, published posthumously in 1779, “There are other parts of the universe (besides the machines of human invention) which bear still a greater resemblance to the fabric of the world, and which, therefore, afford a better conjecture concerning the universal origin of the system. These parts are animals and plants. The world plainly resembles more an animal or a vegetable, than it does a watch or a knitting-loom … And does not a plant or an animal, which springs from vegetation or generation, bear a stronger resemblance to the world, than does any artificial machine, which arises from reason and design?” 58 Hume’s argument was surprisingly prescient in the light of modern cosmology. Until the 1960s, most scientists still thought of the universe as a machine, and moreover as a machine that was running out of steam, heading for its final heat death. According to the second law of thermodynamics, promulgated in 1855, the universe would gradually lose the capacity to do work. It would eventually freeze in “a state of universal rest and death,” as William Thomson, later Lord Kelvin, put it. 59 It was not until 1927 that Georges Lemaître, a cosmologist and Roman Catholic priest, advanced a scientific hypothesis like Hume’s idea of the origin of the universe in an egg or seed. Lemaître suggested that the universe began with a “creation-like event,” which he described as “the cosmic egg exploding at the moment of creation.” 60 Later called the Big Bang, this new cosmology echoed many archaic stories of origins, like the Orphic creation myth of the Cosmic Egg in ancient Greece, or the Indian myth of Hiranyagarbha, the primal Golden Egg. 61 Significantly, in all these myths the egg is both a primal unity and a primal polarity, since an egg is a unity composed of two parts, the yolk and the white, an apt symbol of the emergence of “many” from “one.” Lemaître’s theory predicted the expansion of the universe, and was supported by the discovery that galaxies outside our own are moving away from us with a speed proportional to their distance. In 1964, the discovery of a faint background glow everywhere in the universe, the cosmic microwave background radiation, revealed what seemed to be fossil light left over from the early universe, soon after the Big Bang. The evidence for an initial “creation-like event” became overwhelming, and by 1966 the Big Bang theory became orthodox. Cosmology now tells a story of a universe that began extremely small, less than the size of a pinhead, and very hot. It has been expanding ever since. As it grows, it cools down, and as it cools, new forms and structures appear within it: atomic nuclei and electrons, stars, galaxies, planets, molecules, crystals and biological life. The machine metaphor has long outlived its usefulness, and holds back scientific thinking in physics, biology and medicine. Our growing, evolving universe is much more like an organism, and so is the earth, and so are oak trees, and so are dogs, and so are you.
58. Hume (2008), Part VII. 59. Thomson (1852). 60. Singh (2004). 61. Long (1983)
Sheldrake, Rupert (2012-09-04). Science Set Free: 10 Paths to New Discovery (p. 52,53). Random House, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
The Trinity can also be compared..
(written ca. 1360–87) from
Piers the Ploughman—by William Langland
The Trinity can also be compared to a torch or taper, which consist of wax and wick twined together, and a flame that flares from them both. And just as this wax, wick, and flame are used to light a fire, so the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost kindle among Christian people a fire of love and of faith which cleanses them from their sins. And as you sometimes see a torch whose flame is suddenly blown out, yet whose wick continues to smolder without setting fire to the matchwood, so the Holy Ghost is a God without mercy, and a Grace without life, to all those so depraved as to wish to quench true love, or destroy the very life which our Lord created.
‘Workmen who stay awake on winter nights are not cheered so much by glowing embers as they are by a blazing torch, or by a candle, or anything that gives out flame. So, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost do not grant men grace or forgiveness of sins till the fire of the Holy Ghost begins to burn and to blaze. For the Holy Ghost glows by as an ember until true love lies down by His fire and blows it into flame; and then He flares out like a living fire, and warms the Father and the Son and melts their power into mercy. So, in winter, you can see icicles on the roofs of house, which once they feel the heat of the sun, melt in a minute into mist and water; and in the same way the grace of the Holy Ghost melts into mercy the great might of the Trinity—but only for those who practice mercy themselves.






