Gregory-Aland 1761: A Gospels Manuscript?


Daniel B. Wallace's avatarDaniel B. Wallace

We have a team from CSNTM working at the National Library of Greece in Athens this summer. A big team—from seven to nine people at any given time. The work is both exhausting and exhilarating. Handling precious documents all day long, while trying to produce accurate, aesthetically-pleasing photographs, can be emotionally draining work. But every new day the teams are ready for more.

digitizing st NLG

Counting Quires

One of my tasks is to count quires. A quire is, medievally speaking, eight leaves or four double-leaves (bifolia) laid down, then folded vertically in the middle. These leaves then form a quire and they are sewn into the binding at the crease. Some scribes numbered their quires by writing, in very faint and small ink, the number of the quire on either first page (recto) or last page (verso) of a quire. Then, when it came time to stitch all the quires together they…

View original post 959 more words

Planned Parenthood Selling Fetal Parts — Jonah Goldberg | National Review Online


!!!!jonah-goldberg-1-sizedPlanned Parenthood Selling Fetal Parts — What Would John Rawls Think? | National Review Online.

Church, Heresy, and Pure Religion – The New Atlantis


!!!!_Isaac_Newton_SF_still_624x352Newton suggested that the universe was the divine analogue of the part of the brain (the “Sensorium”) that allowed humans to think and to be aware of the outside world, with the difference that God perceived things “by their immediate presence to himself,” without the mediation of sense organs, nerves, and brain. In a second analogy between the infinite power of God and the nature of mortals, he stated that God’s creative powers “to form and reform the Parts of the Universe” were massively greater than the capacity of humans to move their own bodies.

by Rob Iliffe

via Church, Heresy, and Pure Religion – The New Atlantis.

Is Design Dead?


“Think of our most advanced computer software—it’s utterly stone age compared to the genetic code. The design advocate uses this data to support the philosophical claim that this type of intricacy and level of functionality strongly suggest behind-the-scenes intelligent engineering.Note that this claim has nothing to do with Darwinian common descent, and it doesn’t rule out Natural selection as a mechanism” Bravo!

A Neuroscientific Look at Speaking in Tongues–NY Times


1107-sci-webBRAINhttp://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/07/health/07brain.html?_r=1&

Orthodox Alexithymia


http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/2015/07/orthodox-alexithymia.html