Author / James Ross Kelly
The Babylon Bee Hires New Managing Editor | Matthew Distefano
JUPITER, FL – The Babylon Bee, often described as the Christian version of The Onion, hired new managing editor John-Paul Matthews in hopes that they can finally learn how to create good satire. “We
were just getting tired of the same old jokes,” one columnist said, sipping from a red Starbucks cup with “John 3:16” hand-written in Sharpie. “We knew that we had to bring in someone with a real sense of Christian comedy.”
Source: The Babylon Bee Hires New Managing Editor | Matthew Distefano
The reason we’re becoming more extreme – YouTube
The Ex-President’s Closest Allies Now Pleading the Fifth – YouTube
“This is this is a very serious thing..if you ignore it you do so at the peril of the nation, in the sense that if you look at history, unsuccessful coups that aren’t addressed within the legal framework in a nation of laws tend to be dress rehearsals and I think that’s what we’re looking at right now in the sense that all of the actions seem to me not to be so much about what happened in 2020 anymore but about in preparation for what might happen in 2024.” Steve Schmidt
Why Pastors Are Joining the Great Resignation | Sojourners
The Great Resignation is underway in the United States with an astounding 3 percent of employees collectively refusing the terms of low-wages, absent benefits, and dangerous working conditions expected by their bosses. Pastors, too, are walking away. Recent poll data collected by Barna Group, a California-based research firm that studies faith and culture, confirmed what I’m seeing among my friends and colleagues. According to Barna, about 38 percent of Protestant senior pastors surveyed have considered leaving ministry over the past year. Among pastors under age 45, that number rose to 46 percent.
Source: Why Pastors Are Joining the Great Resignation | Sojourners
Rupert Sheldrake, the Most Controversial Scientist on Earth, Speaks Out
This article was published in New Dawn 169 Author and biologist Rupert Sheldrake has courted considerable controversy during his long career. Perhaps best known for his hypothesis of morphic resonance (that the so-called laws of nature are more like habits subject to change – see ‘What is Morphic Resonance’ in this issue of New Dawn), his tussles with the scientific establishment reveal a great deal about the dogmatism of mainstream science. Like anomalien.com on Facebook To stay in touch & get our latest news Beginning with A New Science of Life – published in 1981 – his many books about…
Source: Rupert Sheldrake, the Most Controversial Scientist on Earth, Speaks Out
Liberal Christianity on the Rise | Vance Morgan
According to Elizabeth Dias, “a different, more liberal Christianity is ascendant: less focused on sexual politics and more on combating poverty, climate […]
Congressmembers Allegedly Helped Plan January 6th Insurrection | RepresentUs
You heard that right: multiple members of Congress allegedly helped plan the January 6th insurrection on the U.S. Capitol. So, let’s break down this explosive report.
Source: Congressmembers Allegedly Helped Plan January 6th Insurrection | RepresentUs
The Science of Forgiveness – John Templeton Foundation
Christian nationalism is real. The way you talk about it might make things worse. | The Week
The concept has circulated for decades in scholarly circles, where it was more often used in an international context than applied to the United States. But since 2016, it’s become a popular term of art for Christian conservative politics. Georgetown international affairs professor Paul D. Miller defines Christian nationalism as “the belief that the American nation is defined by Christianity, and that the government should take active steps to keep it that way.” Sociologists Andrew Whitehead and Samuel Perry use six criteria, including belief that the federal government should declare the U.S. a Christian nation and that American success is “part of God’s plan.
“It’s easy to find criticisms of Christian nationalism, which dominate both academic and popular discussions of the subject. It’s far more difficult to locate advocates, at least under that name. Rather than encouraging substantive analysis of specific opinions or proposals, the label functions as a pre-emptive dismissal. To describe something “Christian nationalism” is inevitably to reject it.
That rejection is too quick, though. It’s possible to worry about specific kinds of political enthusiasm without dismissing all religious interpretation of American history or purpose. “Christian nationalism” is simply too broad identify the real problem with some brands of right-wing politics — as shown by the fact that a majority of Americans meet at least one of Whitehead and Perry’s criteria. Christian nationalism, in the scholarly sense, certainly exists in this country. But in its popular incarnation, the phrase often confuses more than it clarifies — and its overuse may undermine one of our best defenses against the real thing.
Source: Christian nationalism is real. The way you talk about it might make things worse. | The Week
St. John One: One 