
The long history of defective Christian scriptural exegesis occasioned by problematic translations . . . .
Source: Traditio Deformis by David Bentley Hart | Articles | First Things

The long history of defective Christian scriptural exegesis occasioned by problematic translations . . . .
Source: Traditio Deformis by David Bentley Hart | Articles | First Things

I think I am very close to concluding that this whole “New Atheism” movement is only a . . . .
Source: Believe It or Not by David Bentley Hart | Articles | First Things
It seems to me that we have come this way before. Some of the signposts are new, perhaps — “Bacteria,” “Bach,” and so on — but the scenery looks very familiar, if now somewhat overgrown, and it is hard not to feel that the path is the same one that Daniel Dennett has been treading for five decades. I suppose it would be foolish to expect anything else. As often as not, it is the questions we fail to ask — and so the presuppositions we leave intact — that determine the courses our arguments take; and Dennett has been studiously avoiding the same set of questions for most of his career.